Charlene Snyder Sentenced in Death of Two-Year-Old Daughter in Las Vegas
Charlene Snyder was sentenced to life in prison for neglecting her 2-year-old daughter, Adacelli. The child had cerebral palsy and weighed only 11 pounds at the time of her death. Police detectives said it was the worst child neglect case they’ve ever seen. Adacelli was found dead inside the family’s filthy mobile home in a room filled with animal and human feces and rotting food. There was broken glass on the floor and spider webs everywhere in the house. The girl was covered with lice and nits, and her face was covered with bites and insect eggs. Adacelli’s eye was discolored, her abdomen was bruised, open sores dotted her buttocks and thighs, and dried fecal matter and urine covered her lower body.
Synder claims that she didn’t know how to take care of a special needs child.
On March 5, the trial will start for Snyder’s boyfriend, Jack Richardson, who faces similar charges of murder and neglect. Snyder and Richardson were arrested by undercover officers on their way to family court for a hearing for their three surviving children.
Child Protective Services monitored Snyder and Richardson from 2003 to 2004. CPS says that the family was visited by a social worker for a year, but had made major improvements, so the visits stopped. CPS supposedly didn’t receive any calls about the family despite the fact that neighbors told local news reporters that the home smelled foul and the children were never seen playing outside.
Snyder’s three surviving children were adopted by their grandmother and live out of state.
Going through the facts, you realize how many folks dropped the ball on Adacelli and her siblings - CPS, early intervention services, neighbors, Adacelli’s pediatrician and neurologist, friends and family, and local schools. Is it that easy to ignore white trash, even when their trailer stinks to high heaven and the kids are starving to death? Fear and loathing in Las Vegas, indeed.
Tags: bruises, cerebral-palsy, Charlene-Snyder, child-abuse, cps, Jack-Richardson, Las-Vegas, lice, murder, neglect, parole, prison, starvationRelated Stories
POSTED IN: Uncategorized
27 opinions for Charlene Snyder Sentenced in Death of Two-Year-Old Daughter in Las Vegas
anna
Jan 23, 2007 at 8:07 pm
Doen’t look like she’s starving. I don’t understand parents who do not know how to take care of their children.
CHW1981
Jan 23, 2007 at 9:19 pm
I think that this piece of news really sickens me, i could just feel the hurt for all the sick bitch’s children. I just cannot believe the amount of times the CPS fails to do their duty, is it because there is not enough money to do so, or is it because the are just so fucking lazy they just sit on their asses all day long.And if there is not enough money; why doesn’t the government do something instead of worrying about some stupid ass war. Also if this dumb bitch didn’t want the baby why didn’t she give her up? Isn’t there a place where you can take newborns with no stings attached? As usual I hope that someone in jail gets a whiff of this news and teaches those stupid fucks the meaning of vigilantie justice..
Michelle G.
Jan 24, 2007 at 12:02 am
To add insult to injury, the poor child was buried in an unmarked grave. The local people donated a memorial for her.
What absolute trash those parents are. Taking care of a special needs child isn’t easy, but letting her starve to death covered in insects is *insane*, not the actions of struggling but well meaning parents.
EchoedMemory
Jan 24, 2007 at 5:09 am
I am SICK TO DEATH of hearing about the death of innocent children and CPS NOT being involved. I cannot believe that they keep using the term “protective” when they do everything BUT. Why choose that career path when you don’t plan on following up on cases, when you have no intention of LISTENING and WATCHING closely to see what’s really going on?
I plan on getting my degree in Social Work. If I’m ever at a home and something just doesn’t look right or the neighbours have something to say that contradicts the family’s story, you can bet your ass that I’m gonna be outside their windows at night, off hours, to see if there’s really something going on. To hell with the laws. If it means saving the life of a child and taking them away from starvation, abuse, neglect…I’m gonna do whatever the hell it takes.
Susan
Jan 24, 2007 at 10:03 am
This is just ridiculous…”She didn’t know how to care for a special needs child” I had my first child at 25 weeks when I was only 20 years old. I didn’t know how to care for a special needs child but my son, now 4, is a healthy thriving boy. So that is NO excuse for someone to neglect their child… I hope she dies in prison..
donnajean
Jan 24, 2007 at 4:12 pm
I work in law enforcement, and it is pretty obvious to me that there is about a 99.99% chance that these “white trash” parents were into drugs, most likely meth. Remember that when you or your friends are tempted to get high!
EchoedMemory, I feel for you and your commitment. But I hope you will save your message and read it again five or ten years from now, when you have three times as many cases as any human being could manage, and you are hamstrung by regulations. The parents killed the child, not CPS!
CHW1981
Jan 24, 2007 at 5:20 pm
*donna Jean*
for your information people have complained about these people before!!!! and what did CPS do?? Not a FUCKING thing!! And now look what happens. If a person decides to take on the commitment they should exercise their abilities in every way possible, instead of acting all stressed about it.
L
Jan 24, 2007 at 5:48 pm
Terrible. As a mother of a child w/ Cerebral Palsy, It outrages me more than most cases. If the mother didn’t know how to care for a special needs child she should have taken the time to contact agencies that could have helped! But, it seems this woman obviously shouldn’t have been caring for any children, much less a handicapped child. I was 18 when I had my son w/ CP, and honestly I was clueless as to how to care for him - But, I quickly took advantage of the resourses that were offered, and I learned. It takes alot of effort and love to care for a special child, but when you love and care about the child you do whatever you have to. This woman obviously didn’t care much for the poor little girl. So, so sad. :(
I wonder if this is the same case blogged about at Coroner Stories? It sure sounds like it.
http://www.coronerstories.com/2006/02/13/%e2%80%9cthe-girl-of-my-dreams%e2%80%94part-i%e2%80%9d/
(sorry about the very long link!)
The Zero Boss
Jan 24, 2007 at 6:30 pm
“I work in law enforcement, and it is pretty obvious to me that there is about a 99.99% chance that these “white trash” parents were into drugs, most likely meth. Remember that when you or your friends are tempted to get high!”
Plenty of people drink or do recreational drugs, and never harm their kids. Drugs do NOT cause bad parenting - bad parents cause bad parenting.
flick
Jan 25, 2007 at 6:17 am
The Zero Boss -
There are plenty of families where the parents abuse alcohol and drugs that *don’t come to the attention of law enforcement*.
That doesn’t mean the kids are well cared for. You can’t parent decently when you’re high. Period.
Tammy
Jan 25, 2007 at 11:25 pm
Attention Parents, Teachers, Everyone Who Cares:
For those of you who suspect that a child is being abused in your family or community, please do the RIGHT thing and report it ASAP. By reporting the abuse, you could save a life, instead of ignoring it and thereby contributing to the death of an innocent child.
What is this world coming to? Did you read this article about poor little Brooklyn Holcolm in Princeton WV?
Here’s the link: http://www.wvva.com/News/index.php?ID=10492
I hope that Ronald Holcolm, an EVIL youth minister, gets what’s coming to him.
Jessica
Jan 26, 2007 at 12:27 am
Flick,
I don’t think Zero was talking about smoking a bag while the kids run wild or shooting up while junior munches his Cheerio’s in the morning. Having a beer or a small drink now and then is absolutely fine. Having a small portion of your life for yourself is fine. So you’ve got a sitter and you go see friends for the evening and RESPONSIBLY have a LITTLE bit of recreational fun…big deal. Don’t give me that shit that 2 drinks or a couple of puffs on a joint IN PRIVATE is bad parenting. It’s being human. Most of us can handle those and still function just fine.
flick
Jan 26, 2007 at 7:03 am
Jessica -
Sure, there are plenty of parents who limit their intake to one or two beers every once in a while.
However, I will maintain that the *best* idea if you’re a parent is to not use any recreational intoxicants, ever. Most if not all of them are addictive, see. Addiction progresses.
The one night a year you decide to tie one on while the kids are asleep could be the one night that your child decides to crawl out of bed at 2 a.m. and drink drain cleaner or wander into the road. And you won’t hear it.
Also, it’s a darn bad idea to use anything that’s illegal around your kids, even in moderation. Children figure out awful young what pot is, for example, and that it’s illegal. Maybe you don’t mind setting that as an example for your children, that breaking the law is okay. My opinion differs. Kids hear people talk, even in “code,” and put 2 and 2 together quicker than you can believe. There are very few secrets in families.
To me, “recreation” is playing a game, taking a walk, indulging in a hobby like woodworking. Not getting high. I think it is an extremely bad example to set, that “recreation” is getting high. Not one that I want my kids to pick up, that getting loaded = fun. YMMV.
You become a parent, it ain’t about you, you, you any more.
julie
Jan 28, 2007 at 3:21 pm
Hey, flick. Does that mean parents should swear off coffee, too? It is highly addictive.
By your reasoning, parents shouldn’t ever be out of sight of their children or, heaven forfend, watch a movie with the volume turned up high enough that they might not hear their child sneak off to drink that drain cleaner.
And, incidentally, meth is highly addictive, but weed is not. Actually, to most of us, alcohol isn’t addictive either. Also, drinking is not the same as “getting loaded.” A glass or two of wine or beer does not get me loaded, and I like to think I’m actually presenting a picture to my kids of how one can drink responsibly, how drink can be a part of enjoying a good meal or relaxing with some Trivial Pursuit. I have never been so drunk since I gave birth that I would not have heard my kid run off to play in traffic. I’m actually quite certain of that.
Quite probably with your paranoid confluence of drinking and being drunk/loaded/high, you’re teaching your kids that the two are the same thing, and your kids may be less inclined to learn to drink in moderation. It’s like the parents who try to teach their kids abstinence by making them afraid and ashamed of sex; in my experience, teaching like that usually has the opposite effect. Because your kids will encounter opportunities to drink sometime, and they likely will drink, and their model will be “drinking equals getting sloshed and making an ass of myself, so I guess I’d better get on with it.” Sweet.
I am hopelessly addicted to caffeine, flick, so lock me the fuck up. Damn. After reading comments like flick’s, I almost inevitably feel the need for some heroin. And I’ve never even done heroin.
Jessica
Jan 28, 2007 at 8:25 pm
Flick,
You’ve given us a wonderful study in extremism. Extremism in any form is a bad thing…and that includes extreme parenting. I believe I was pretty clear about indulging with moderation and responsibilty…and yet you choose to use the words “tie one on”. It is hard to have a civil argument with anyone who blows your words out of proportion…how very republican of you (sorry…that was catty). But seriously, I am quite aware that self-centeredness has no place in parenting…but damn…you are allowed to have SOME time to yourself. You choose not to partake of the wine, beer, pot, etc…then more power to ya. I won’t give you any shit. But you have no right to judge me if I choose to. I can assure you that grown adults who occassionally enjoy these things in a responsible manner are NOT ineffective parents. I’m a little more worried about the ones who have no identity beyond their children. However you choose to unwind…be it with a drink or a nice cross-stitch kit…it’s all the same. If your hobby is woodworking, your kids might wander out into traffic while you’re running your table saw. Seriously…get real. And Julie made a wonderful point about teaching kids responsibility. Whatever you make taboo…they’re probably gonna run and do it. So I’m a piece of shit parent because I like a little wine with my pasta? I don’t think so. I think teaching your kids that it’s okay to point fingers and try to tell others what they should or should not be doing is much more damaging. Just one girl’s opinion.
flick
Jan 29, 2007 at 2:35 am
“Actually, to most of us, alcohol isn’t addictive either.”
Perhaps you know in advance whether or not your children are among those with a propensity to alcoholism. I don’t know that of my kids. Since drinking alcohol isn’t necessary, the most accurate and reasoned information they can get from me is, “The best idea is, don’t drink. This is why,” etc.
That also goes to resisting peer pressure to indulge in behaviors that can get them hurt. Actions have consequences. They need to think highly enough of themselves, and have good knowledge of consequences and risks, to feel that they can endure the ridicule of their friends who want to pass them the crack pipe or engage in a drinking game.
Sadly, some behaviors, such as driving drunk, have consequences that one cannot recover from - serious injury and death. Some people really do die the first time they indulge in crack or heroin. I’ve buried two such friends.
“Whatever you make taboo…they’re probably gonna run and do it.”
That simply isn’t true. If it were, then allowing your kids to do anything they wished and to run around without supervision would result in fine, upstanding honor roll students. It doesn’t; mostly, those are the people who fill our jails.
I’ve known very few people who were scared away from sex by their parents to the point where they couldn’t enjoy it later on in life. Accurate, reasonable information on the matter doesn’t frighten to that extent. Probably, though, when your 14-year-old daughter comes home with her boyfriend, you let them have a sleepover. Am I right? She’s already on the Pill, too, “just in case.” Yes? Sheesh.
Tell me, you two - how do your children survive childhood? Apparently nothing is forbidden, because then “they’re probably gonna run and do it.”
I guess if your kid came home from school and said, “Oh, hey, Mom, I want to smoke crack!” you’d give them a lecture on buying from a good dealer, and how to use it responsibly. Because if you forbid them to try it, they’ll do it anyway…
But whoops, if you say it’s okay or not so bad, they’re going to rebel and be goody-two-shoes? LOL! Doesn’t work that way.
It’s no wonder the schools are crawling with drugs and violence and pregnant teens. There are a lot of parents who seem to share your philosophy of not forbidding any behavior of their kids.
Back to alcohol specifically, the latest research indicates that the younger your child begins using alcohol, the more likely they are to end in alcoholism. It is a myth that you can “teach” children to drink responsibly by allowing them to do it from a young age. France, with its history of allowing kids to drink with meals, is loaded with alcoholics; they have just recently begun admitting the magnitude and cause of their problem.
You need to think about setting higher standards for your kids, you two. Because whether or not you believe anything else I’ve written, believe this: Kids like to push the envelope. If your standards are rock-bottom - and it looks like yours are - do you really want them to be WORSE than that? Instead of having a National Merit Scholar, you’re gonna be raising bail money.
Indulge in all the caffeine you wish. It isn’t much of an intoxicant.
The Zero Boss
Jan 29, 2007 at 2:48 pm
Actually, caffeine is quite the intoxicant. Various cultures have banned the coffee bean throughout history. Read THE DEVIL’S PICNIC by Taras Grescoe for the lowdown on this drug.
Many illegal drugs are not habit forming. Marijuana isn’t. Ecstasy isn’t. The most habit forming drugs (outside of heroine) are the LEGAL ones: the morphine-based painkillers.
No one’s saying you should hand your kid a joint and a pint, flick. I would bet that nearly all of the parents here formally forbid their kids from using any sort of alcohol and drugs until they’re of legal adult age.
The point is, there are safe and responsible ways to use most intoxicants, your fear-mongering to the contrary notwithstanding. I know plenty of people who drink, and who even use other intoxicants on occasion. I know very, very few addicts.
As for the schools “crawling” with all the problems you mentioned - drug use is actually the same it’s always been. The numbers are rather invariant. Our War on Drugs has done nothing on that front. And teen pregnancy is down around the country; it’s highest in those areas of the country that stick with abstinence-only education.
On, and your assumptions about how other people’s kids are or are going to turn out? Way off base, dude. You don’t have enough information to fling around those accusations.
The Zero Boss
Jan 29, 2007 at 2:51 pm
And FYI - I helped raise a stepdaughter from age 9 to be a mature and responsible woman. No bail money required.
flick
Jan 31, 2007 at 7:35 am
The Zero Boss -
Are you Julie? Posting under two names here?
According to Julie, if you forbid your kids something, they’re MORE likely to do it.
You should look up the stats on drug use over the last 100 years, and pay particular attention to the last 40 years. There has been quite a bit of progress on the war on drugs.
It would be helpful to you if you got your info from places other than the drug legalization sites.
Julie
Jan 31, 2007 at 11:24 pm
Wait, flick. On the one hand you’re saying all these problems resulting from lax parenting are on the increase, right (”crawling with drugs and pregnancy”)? On the other hand, we’re making progress in the war on drugs? You can’t have it both ways. Or maybe you can, because there is no real evidence for either point of view, so what the hell, right? Claim whatever you want if you’re not going to back it up.
As for my parenting, well, I parent the way my parents did: Reasonably. My mom did not encourage me to have sex or drink when I was underage; neither did she teach me that either thing was inherently bad. She taught me that both can be bad or good depending on how responsibly you do it. I think you would think she was a very lax parent, though I was disciplined when I needed it.
Incidentally, I did no drugs, I remained a virgin past high school, never drove drunk, and was a National Merit Scholar. I did drink, but never became an alcoholic. Of course, I realize the plural of ‘anecdote’ is not ‘data,’ but we don’t all turn out like you seem to think.
Also, at no time did I say that I let my kids drink underage. At no time did any of us even imply that that would be a good idea. I said I try to set a good example of how you can drink without getting drunk, without needing to drink every day, without making a jerk of yourself. I think that trying to teach your kid to actually consider his/her choices and reflect on them and understand what responsibility is actually holds them a higher standard than “just say no” or some similar teaching. My mom asked me to become a Kantian, to internalize a moral code, because she knew an internalized moral code is a deep one, one from which you will not vary. And I have not. It may not entirely jibe with yours, but it is unwavering, and that’s a pretty fucking high standard. It’s in considerable contrast to the kind of teaching Kant railed against, the external moral code: Don’t do it because it’s illegal. Don’t do it because there’s some outside chance you could be an alcoholic. Don’t do it because your friends are doing it. Don’t do it because it’s bad for your health and a hundred other things. None of those things matter unless there is a deeply held, internalized moral code underpinning them.
Oh, but that’s just me and my low standards. Clearly I’m too drunk and high to actually think, so how could I monitor my kid’s behavior and discipline him appropriately for his age and the behavior in question. Some days I wonder how I keep my job.
Finally, as the daughter of an alcoholic, I would like to make one more comment: If you really know your kids and you find that they are drinking underage (and they likely will–not all kids do, but most will at some point), you fucking monitor whether you think they are doing it moderately and with some sense of responsibility. You talk to your kids. You piece together what they’re saying, because (at least back in the dark days when I was a teenager) they are likely not telling you the whole story. You have to know your kids and trust your kids well enough to give them some freedom but still know what’s really going on with them. It takes time, it takes self-discipline on your part as a parent, it takes a huge amount of love and worry and understanding and compassion (not to be too prententious) for flawed humanity and the human condition. In the case of my parents, who were worried that I would inherit my dad’s alcoholism, it meant questioning me and dinner together every night and getting to really know my friends and their moms to know who I was spending my time with. When they had concerns that I was drinking too much, they managed to have a conversation about that with me. My parents had already laid the stage of the internal moral code, remember? So then all they had to do in that conversation was demonstrate respect for me, and you know what? At age 17, I stopped drinking altogether and didn’t start again until years later when I was quite sure I wasn’t going to become an alcoholic (because, really, who has the time to be an alcoholic?).
That’s committed parenting. Of course, they could have just pushed me to be perfect and treated me more like a serf than a person. Sure, they could have done that. I guess that would have made them better parents in your book, but I seem to have turned out just fine. My son is happy and healthy and well behaved. I am happily married to the father of my child. I have a house; I garden; I make my own pickles. I have a good job, and so does my husband (who, by the way, drinks approximately one alcoholic beverage every six months and doesn’t go in for coffee either). That’s the seedy, transgressive life we’re modeling for our son. Straight out of the police blotter, man.
Julie
Jan 31, 2007 at 11:25 pm
Criminy–I didn’t realize I went on so long. Sorry, people.
christy
Feb 28, 2007 at 1:18 pm
THIS WOMEN IS A COUSIN OF MINE. GRANTED I LIVE IN OHIO ALONG WITH 90% OF THE FAMILY. I KNOW SHE ALWAYS HAD A HARD TIME TAKING CARE OF SELF FROM THE TIME SHE WAS A TEENAGER. STINKY NASTY. I FOR ONE HOPE SHE ROTTS IN PRISON. AND I’M VERY HAPPY THAT MY AUNT HAS STEPPED IN AND ADOPTED THE OTHER CHILDREN. JUST TO LET YOU KNOW THEY ARE ADJUSTING VERY WELL AND FOR ONCE IN THERE LIFE THEY ARE HAPPY AND HEATHY. NOTHING WILL BRING ADACELLI BACK. ATLEAST THE OTHER CHILDREN ARE BEING TAKEN VERY GOOD CARE OF. AND THE COMMUNITY HAS DONE A WONDERFUL JOB WITH ALL THEY HAVE DONE.
Melissa
Feb 28, 2007 at 2:10 pm
Why didn’t any of the family step in or ask how she was doing?
christy
Mar 1, 2007 at 3:18 pm
IF IT’S ANY OF YOUR BUSINESS. MY AUNT WOULD GO TO HER HOUSE AND SHE REFUSSED TO ANSWER THE DOOR. BUT YET LET MY AUNT PAY ALL HER BILLS. AT ONE POINT FROM WHAT I HEAR SHE WAS TAKING CARE OF THINGS. PROBABLY FOR A SHORT TIME. WHO KNOWS. YOU CAN’T REALLY HELP SOMEONE WHO WONT LET YOU IN TO HELP THEM. MY AUNT LIVES IN VEGAS AND I KNOW IF SHE KNEW WHAT WAS GOING ON SHE WOULD OF TAKIN ACTION SOONER. CHARLENE HAS HAD PROBLEMS SINCE SHE WAS A CHILD I MEAN AN INFANT. FROM ABUSE ETC. I KNOW THAT IS NO REASON FOR HER ACTIONS. I FEEL SHE IN WHERE SHE BELONGS. WELL PRISON ISN’T EVEN GOOD ENOUGH FOR SOMEONE WHO ABUSES A CHILD. I LOST A CHILD MYSELF. DUE TO A MAJOR HEART CONDITION. NO I AM NOT A DRUG AND THATS WHAT CAUSED MY DAUGHTERS CONDITION. I HAVE A FAMILY OF MY OWN I TAKE CARE OF AND DONT KEEP IN CONTACT TO MUCH WITH THE ONES OUT WEST. BUT WHEN IT COMES TO A CHILD BEING NEGLECTED AND ABUSED I DO GET MAD. I STILL DON’T UNDERSTAND WHY MY RELATIVES THAT LIVE OUT THAT WAY DIDN’T GO TO HER MEMORIAL. THERE’S ALOT OF THINGS I DON’T UNDERSTAND.
ALSO TO LET YOU KNOW I HAVE A WONDERFUL AUNT IN FLORDIA THAT WAS TRYING TO STEP IN AND TAKE HER KIDS. MY AUNT IN FLORDIA ALSO RAISED CHARLENNE AND WAS DOING A GOOD JOB UNTIL SHE GOT INTO DRUGS AND GOT OUT OF CONTROL. THIS GIRL AS A TEENAGER WAS IN GANGS, DRUGS ETC. I’D WAS MY HANDS OF THAT TOO. I’VE ALWAYS TOLD MY CHILDREN YOU GET IN TROUBLE YOU BETTER NOT CALL ME. BECAUSE I WOULD NEVER BAIL MY CHILD OUT OF JAIL. IF THEY WENT TO JAIL THEY WOULD HAVE TO LEARN THE CONSIQENCES. TILL THIS DAY MY KIDS ARE GOOD KIDS. AND I AM A PROUD MOTHER TO HAVE THEM. I HAD A DIFFENENT UP BRINGING THAN CHARLENNE DID. VERY STRICT PARENTS THAT I RESPECTED. SHE HAD NO RESPECT FOR NO ONE NOT EVER HERSELF. SO DON’T BLAME THE FAMILY FOR NOT TRYING TO HELP. BECAUSE I KNOW SHE DID ALL SHE COULD. ADVIOUSLY SHE HAD THE OTHER KIDS NOW.
christy
Mar 1, 2007 at 3:26 pm
I WAS TYPING TO FAST EARLIER. AND MADE A FEW MISTAKES IN MY TYPING. SORRY. BUT TO LET EVERYONE KNOW THE FAMILY DID TRY TO PITCH IN AND HELP. CHARLENNE IS A NUT CASE. AND PROBABLY THOUGHT SHE WASN’T DOING ANYTHING WRONG. SHE PROBABLY HAD AN IQ OF A 3RD GRADER. I GUESS SEX AND DRUGS WAS THE ONLY THING SHE KNEW. I GIVE MY AUNT CREDIT EVERYDAY FOR WHAT SHE’S WENT THOUGH WITH THAT GIRL. IT’S HARD TO WALK AWAY FROM YOUR CHILD YOU ARE TRYING TO HELP LET ALONE THE GRAND KIDS. BUT WHEN YOU ARE REFUSSED VISITATION OVER AND OVER AGAIN. WHAT DO YOU DO. ODVIOUSLY MY AUNT WAS DOING SOMETHING BECAUSE SHE HAS THE OTHER 3 KIDS WHO ARE VERY HAPPY, CLEAN AND SOCIALABLE. IF MY AUNT WAN’T DOING NOTHING BEFORE SHE WOULD NOT HAVE THE KIDS NOW.WAY TO GO AUNT *** TO HELL WITH CHARLENNE.
rest in peace adacelli
Mar 26, 2007 at 9:30 am
well this is hard for me to post a comment on all this because charlene is my sister and adacelli was an angel and everyone that is knocking her down there are alot of fingers to be pointed here not only at charlene at her parents wat about cps i was not present wen all of this happened but i read most of it online yes wen i did find out wat happened i was sick to my stomach how could u let ur child die and then to put the other 3 in danger too i cry alot i used to take care of the other kids wen i lived in las vegas and to kelli she has no room to talk about charlene cause she was the first one doin the shyt with my sister she acts like she was the good one like she never smoked out wit my sis that bitch was the first one in line wit my sis and her bullshyt i dont kno how many times i tryed talkin to her to stopp all the shyt its just hard for me to be here and not see the other children i dont knock ne one for there opinion i felt the same way but charlene needed help long before adacelli was born and no one helped i cant believe it took this to happen well i love you sis REST IN PEACE MY LIL ANGEL ADACELLI L. SNYDER 3/31/03-6/29/05 ILL SEE U IN HEAVEN
karen
Mar 26, 2007 at 10:50 am
Sick….But hey she will be allowed to have more children in the future and be on welfare. Need a license to drive but not have children. We should require one. Mandatory hestorectomy if you ask me.
You must log in to post a comment.