Parents Behaving Badly

3314 opinions for Randall Piercy Update: Father Made Son Live in “Concentration Camp” Conditions

• Weary Parent: Parenting Tweens & Teens » Single Fatherhood
  Oct 17, 2006 at 7:22 am

  […] Parents Behaving Badly ( The world really doesn’t need parents like this. Sometimes the real world sucks!! […]

• Teresa Moses Charged with Torturing, Murdering Son in “Dungeon” Bedroom - from Parents Behaving Badly by Jay Andrew Allen
  Nov 11, 2006 at 12:58 pm

  […] Ugh. Hot tippers Monique and Joanne brought me news of this latest case of child imprisonment. It seems like we’ve been wading through a lot of these lately - from the case of Randall Piercy, who treated his son like a concentration camp prisoner, to the Egyptian couple who treated a young girl like their slave. But 23-year-old Teresa Moses of Richmond, California takes the fucking prize. She’s the motherfreaking BTK Murderer of the Bay Area compared to those other pikers. Moses’ case file crossed the desk of social services repeatedly in the past 18 months. Young Raijon Daniels was taken from her repeatedly during that time, but was ultimately always returned. […]

• Desi
  Nov 12, 2006 at 6:13 pm

  GEE, thanks for the great knock on foster parents. I spend my days and night protecting, loving and giving all my family has to children who are treated like this. We try to show our kids that not all people treat their children as they have been treated. That there is a different way to live your life, so that this behavior doesn’t turn into a generational thing.
  Maybe some day the word will get out that not all foster parents are monsters who deserve to die…?

• The Zero Boss
  Nov 12, 2006 at 6:35 pm

  For God sakes, Desi, I didn’t knock foster parents. I’m merely pointing out a fact. All types of parents - biological, foster, etc. - have committed horrible crimes against their kids.

  If I’m knocking anyone, I’m knocking state and private foster agencies for not appropriately screening their clientele.

• Sir T Fireball
  Nov 20, 2006 at 6:12 am

  I know that civil liberties have never been Americas strong point, but have you now decided to totally do away with the court system?

  Let these people be tried and found guilty by a court of law, not some red-neck kangaroo court as this seems to be. Should they be convicted, then you can have your hanging party. To do so beforehand is just a little premature for the civilised world to accept.

• velmasdtr
  Nov 24, 2006 at 9:56 pm

  ya know the media always tells the truth, what happenend to innocent until proven guilty, and about the media i’m laughing my ass off, they wouldn’t know the truth if it slugged them in the face, God will protect the innocent, isn’t it possible these parents are only guilty of wanting to protect their son from the evils of the world.

• The Zero Boss
  Nov 24, 2006 at 10:05 pm

  Um, who’s doing away with the justice system? This is a blog, not a court of law; I’m under no obligation to wait on a jury. I’m making my opinion known based on the currently available evidence.

  If you have evidence that contradicts what’s out there, let’s here it.

• velmasdtr
  Nov 27, 2006 at 10:53 pm

  what if there was evidence???? what if this was nothing more than a vendictive situation..

• Bill
  Jan 1, 2007 at 4:45 am

  Regardless of what you think or not think, this man deserves his due process. Its idiots with their opinions that make it hard to get a fair trial. Report the facts and leave your opinions at the door.

  Idiots.

• PiercyFamMember
  Jan 13, 2007 at 2:48 pm

  REGARDLESS OF WHAT ANY OF YOU THINK, YOU ARE ONLY BELIEVING THE MEDIA. RANDY IS NOT GUILTY. UNTIL YOU KNOW THE FULL STORY, SHUT THE HELL UP. I STAND BY MY FAMILY MEMBER. RANDY HAS COURT ORDERED DOCUMENTS TO KEEP THE CAMERAS AND HIS SON THE WAY HE DID, TO PROTECT HIS SON FROM A PREVIOUS INCIDENT OF MOLESTATION. GET THE FACTS BEFORE YOU JUDGE, NONE OF YOU ARE GOD!!!!

• velmasdtr
  Jan 16, 2007 at 9:32 am

  i am also a family member, to be precise, i’m randall’s mother, for a fact i know he’s only guilty of being a protective and caring parent, this is nothing more then a vendication situation, stay tuned for the facts, and let God be the judge, thank you also watch an upcoming show on dr. phil

• Clint and Lynn Engstrom Accused of Keeping Daughter Captive for Two Years - from Parents Behaving Badly by Jay Andrew Allen
  Jan 18, 2007 at 6:00 pm

  […] Sigh. Here we go again - another child imprisonment case. How many of those have we seen in the past year? At a minimum, there’s Randall Piercy, who used security cameras to keep his son locked in his room; Teresa Moses, who killed her son through torture in her basement/dungeon; and Abdel-Nasser Youssef Ibrahim and his ex-wife Amal Ahmed Ewis Abdel-Motelib, who made a young Egyptian girl their house slave. Oh, oh - and how can I forget the Gravelles?! And those are only the ones I can remember off of the top of my head. […]

• LadyDi
  Jan 18, 2007 at 6:46 pm

  As i read the comments from the family members.It sickins me.I am so freaking tired of excuses.Tired of familys not getting involved,to save a child .

  Yes Velmasdtr God will judge.Heaven help all that stood by and did nothing as well.

• pamela
  Jan 18, 2007 at 9:12 pm

  FIRST OFF LET ME JUST SAY THAT IF THIS MAN IS INNOCENR THEN PROVE IT TO THE COURTS.IF THIS MAN AND HIS WIFE ARE GUILTY THEN LET THEM PAY FOR THEIR CRIME.CHILDREN NEED TO BE PROTECTED FORM ALL HARM BECAUSE AS ANYONE KNOW THAT THEY CAN BE EASILY TARGETED FOR VICTIMIZATION.THEIR QUESTIONS THAT EVEN THE FAMILY SHOULD BE ASKING LIKE WHY THE HELL WASENT THE CHILD ALLOWED TO AT LEAST COME OUT OF THE ROOM FOR MORE THE AN HR OR TWO A DAY AND WHY DID HE HAVE TO COOK HIS OWN MEALS.IF THESE PEOPLE ARE GUILTY THEN SO ARE THE FAMILY FOR FAILING TO PROTECT THIS CHILD.

• pamela
  Jan 18, 2007 at 9:14 pm

  SORRY ABOUT THE SPELLING.

• PiercyFamMember
  Jan 19, 2007 at 6:34 pm

  Firstly:
  LadyDi Says: “As i read the comments from the family members.It sickins me.I am so freaking tired of excuses.Tired of familys not getting involved,to save a child.Yes Velmasdtr God will judge.Heaven help all that stood by and did nothing as well.”

  Well Miss, who are YOU to judge US or Randall? Did someone die and proclaim you God and CNN didn’t report it? I think not. YOU my dear, are merely going by what the NEWS and NEWSPAPERS are reporting. They do NOT have the inside story, they do not know everything. The News as everyone knows it, is all ONE-SIDED to sympathize and generate ratings. That’s their number one goal, ratings. And Randall’s case is providing them with those ratings. So until you truly truly know what is going on, what went on, and what will happen (which I highly doubt you are psychic) I suggest you keep a clear mind. Judge Not, for YOU are NOT God.

  Secondly:
  pamela Says: “FIRST OFF LET ME JUST SAY THAT IF THIS MAN IS INNOCENR THEN PROVE IT TO THE COURTS.”

  Thank you Pamela and that is exactly what his lawyers are doing.

  pamela Says: “CHILDREN NEED TO BE PROTECTED FORM ALL HARM BECAUSE AS ANYONE KNOW THAT THEY CAN BE EASILY TARGETED FOR VICTIMIZATION.”

  We agree, which is what Randall was doing, and he has court ordered documents that prove it. Ignorance is bliss.

  pamela Says: “THEIR QUESTIONS THAT EVEN THE FAMILY SHOULD BE ASKING LIKE WHY THE HELL WASENT THE CHILD ALLOWED TO AT LEAST COME OUT OF THE ROOM FOR MORE THE AN HR OR TWO A DAY AND WHY DID HE HAVE TO COOK HIS OWN MEALS.”

  He was allowed. Again, Ignorance is bliss. Until you know the FULL TRUTH and STORY, then don’t cast judgement down upon Randall or his family. Stay tuned, the truth WILL come out, and America will be apologizing to Randall Piercy!

  pamela Says: “IF THESE PEOPLE ARE GUILTY THEN SO ARE THE FAMILY FOR FAILING TO PROTECT THIS CHILD.”

  And Again, Ignorance is Bliss. You do not know anything about Randall or his family. You do not know the truth. You as well are going off of what the media says, and believing what they say, just like a little “lemming”. Thank you for keeping the media ratings up, I’m sure Randall will appreciate your apology for judging him when he is found innocent and ALL charges are DROPPED.

  On a side note: Dr.Phil McGraw has interviewed Randall and the show will be airing soon, so check your local listings. Randall gets to tell his side of what is going on FINALLY.

• The Zero Boss
  Jan 19, 2007 at 6:39 pm

  PiercyFamMember, if you disagree with the media and prosecutor’s accounts, then why not tell us what ACTUALLY happened? Dispense with the “who are you to judge” crap and tell the Piercy’s side of the story. Until you can do that, people are going to form conclusions based on the available evidence.

  Which claims in the above article, and in the media in general, are false? Which did not happen? How did Piercy really treat his son?

  Surely if he can say all of this to Dr. Phil, you can enlighten us poor deluded souls in the blogosphere.

• PiercyFamMember
  Jan 19, 2007 at 6:48 pm

  “rolls eyes”

  Well Mr.Zero Boss, for one, the truth WILL be told when the time is right. You don’t expect me to actually be willing to blow his case do you? Tell pertinent information that could be crucial to his defense and the such. Oh wait, that’s exactly what people want his family to do. They want us to talk, they want us to say things that could be misconstrued by the media, anything to get this “god awful man” off the streets for good. But, I don’t think we will be doing that, sorry for the disappointment. When the truth is meant to be known, trust me, you will hear it. And you can start off by listening to what Randall has to say on the Dr.Phil show soon. Which by the way, THEY contacted him, not vice versa as some people are concluding. Secondly in reference to “Surely if he can say all of this to Dr. Phil, you can enlighten us poor deluded souls in the blogosphere.” I am not Randall. I can’t speak for him. And to assume I could, is ignorant. Sorry for that disappointment as well.

• The Zero Boss
  Jan 19, 2007 at 6:52 pm

  Oh, of course. You know the truth, but you’re not gonna tell us, because we’ll just distort it.

  What bs. If you had the truth, you and his lawyer would be crowing it from the rooftops. As it is, I haven’t even heard a preliminary defense from his lawyer.

  If you want us to believe he’s innocent, you’re going to have to offer more than “trust me”. Pretend that we’re all from Missouri and Show Us. Because if there’s evidence of his innocence, every crime blogger from here on up will trumpet it to the skies.

• pamela
  Jan 19, 2007 at 9:21 pm

  ok iwill apologize in advance if i,am wrong,but their are so many abuse cases of children today that ,if he is truly innocent then why let the media have their way with him calling him and his family abusers?I also agree with mr.zero boss that mr.pierce and his lawyers would be crawling through the rooftops if they had evidence of his innocents and that he and his lawyer(s) are gonna have to give the public more then a trust me.Well actually mr and mr.zero boss are both wrong mr.piercy and his family and lawyer owe noone any information on his case unless he expects people to beleive his and his family’s story of innocents,WHEN HE GOES TO COURT HE CANNOT REASONABLE EXPECT AND DA, THE JUDGE ,CHILD PROTECTIVE SERVICES, OR HIS PEER(JURORS)T0 BUY THE TRUST ME STOREY IT DON’T WORK THAT WAY THEY ARE GOING TO GO BY THE EVEIDENCE THAT WAS(IS)COLLECTED AT HIS HOME WHEN THEY FOUND THE CHILD. BY THE WAY ANY NORMAL PERSON WITHOUT PROOF OF SOMEONE’S INNOCENTS EXSPECIALLY WHERE CHILDREN CONCERNED ARE GOING TO BE HARD JUDGERS RIGHT OR WRONG!

• LadyDi
  Jan 20, 2007 at 11:18 am

  Please prove to all that we are wrong to judge.I agree with mr zero boss that every crime blogger would trumpet from the sky his innocences.every news outlet would be reporting his innocences.

  I do have a question Why just Dr Phil…Why not 60 minutes or CNN ect?

• Mister Spade
  Jan 22, 2007 at 1:56 pm

  and the family comes alive once again. i hear all this talk about paper to prove he is innocent , but if he is innocent why did he have his first molestation case sealed up by the court. yeah we do our research as well.

  i don’t have anything to gain from this. it is my opinion. why on earth would you make your own flesh and blood pee in a bottle because he had to go to the bathroom. he put up the camera’s because he was afraid of the molestation thing again. bs is all i have to say.

  you claim to be the loving family. yeah right , your son runs away from home because he is being abused. why did the family help him at that point. oh wait that didn’t count. do over!! if your mom didn’t help ya then she must have been in on it as well.

  you must think we are all born yesterday. he is something that is strange though. why would they put a bracelet on mom to monitor her moves and why did the bond get posted so high. innocent my a***.

  like i said this is my opinion. i hope they throw the book at this overzealous bull ****** .

• Foxfire
  Jan 23, 2007 at 12:57 pm

  Mister Spade, the molestation case that was sealed has NOTHING to do with Randall Piercy. Get your facts straight before you go on a tangent. And give his family a break people, you all know dern well that if this was your family involved, you’d be pleading their innocence to. Try and deny it before the Lord!

• amronjm
  Jan 23, 2007 at 3:16 pm

  Let me get this straight……HE was locked in in room because a RELATIVE sexually molested him? What is wrong with people? I don’t care what the relatives say at this point, there is NO EXCUSE for this type of behavior and I find it very hard to believe that the media can be that wrong about the information. OK, to be fair maybe there are some details left out….BUT, what kind of treatment for sexual abuse could involve locking the VICTIM in a room…no schooling, etc. The article that I read states that the authorities were tipped off by a grandfather that hadn’t visted the home in several years. Kudos to that grandfather! (I personally would have taken the child out the door when I went!) The only other thing I have to wonder, was this grandfather the molester? (Very sorry for the reference if I am wrong!) I will be following this case very closly as I would love to hear some of the “details” that have not come out yet!

• Carry Grant
  Jan 27, 2007 at 6:51 pm

  One thing I know Randal’s Piercy’s mother and like I said before she is totally lost. Her deraigned mind okays all this. By the way the media has not blown this out of proportion all you need to do is read the police report. In the police report it detailed everything they found. If the courts okayed the camera’s then why was the camera in the bathroom pointed at the toilet which by the way is in the police report. According to the police report the bathroom, the boys bedroom was all upstairs. All video cables were going into monitors and computers upstairs in Randy’s bedroom. The molestation case was the boy was molested by another family member underage because the courts sealed it. But my question is did Randy permit this to happen so he could video tape everything? Randal’s other son who now is 18 said he was done the same way for a long time years, he finally got the chance to get away. He does not even refer to Randy as father. One reason they won’t explain this is because they know they don’t have a leg to stand on. As far as Dr. Phil show they don’t need to put this 300 pound ape on but let us hear from the boy. He is the one that had paid the price for this. He is not in foster home he is probably in a mental hospital getting treatment. I don’t care if Randy, Nancy Piercy (mother) falls off the face of the earth, this child will suffer the rest of his life. NO MATTER WHAT NANCY PIERCY YOU CANNOT JUSTIFY THIS ONE, YOU NEED TO GET YOUR HEAD OUT OF THAT CLOUD OF SMOKE, BELIEVE ME IT IS NOT FROM CIGARETTES. HOW CAN YOU EVEN MENTION THE WORD GOD, WHEN YOU HAVE ALREADY JUDGED YOUR GRANDSON AS GUILTY OF LIEING. Randy’s mother pulled a gun on a woman just because she was paranoid so I guess that makes her God.

• Carry Grant
  Jan 27, 2007 at 7:16 pm

  Pamela, you don’t need to apologize because you are right. I know the Piercy family and they are mentally unstable. Randy’s wife Michelle now in jail, her parents turned them in. They say that Michelle needs to get help for what she did, and did nothing to protect this child. The grandparents on the wife’s side said that they were allowed to see their grandson once or twice a year never alone, because Randy always stood close by his son so he could not talk freely to them alone. Randy was afraid what this boy would say. They knew something was going on so when Randy put his house up for sale, investigators came in and looked around posing as real estate investors with the childs grandfather.. They found the boy in his underwear with the camera pointing at him. The door was locked from the outside, the light switches were taped over and the windows were covered. There was a 2 liter bottle for him to piss in. They did not realize how bad this situation was until they went in
  and walked through the house. These investigators are reputable, and they immitately had the conclusion of child porn. Took the comupter. What I was worried about was Randy’s family (Mother) getting to the boy and threatening him to change his story. The boy did not have to say anything, it was all over the place, camera’s, him in his underwear.

• Carry Grant
  Jan 27, 2007 at 7:28 pm

  Foxfire: If this was my family I would disown them and put them in jail and throw away the key. What is wrong with you, why give this family a break-they knew he was being locked up and did nothing. Don’t you have any sympathy for that poor child?You keep mentioning God, Lord. What is wrong with you people, Why not be on that child’s side, noone speaks for him? Why is everyone concerned with this 300 pound ape and his family? They are trash, they need to go back to Illinois and hide. Think for one moment that you were that innocent child sitting on his bed in his underwear using the bathroom in a liter bottle thinking in his mind, what did I do to deserve this? They say he was hyper and had some kind of mental problem. How can they say that when the child was never taken to a doctor to get help. That is just one more sad, excuse. Foxfire you seriously need to reconsider- read the police reports-I did. I know the Piercy family and they need help really bad.

• Carry Grant
  Jan 27, 2007 at 7:37 pm

  Mister Spade: you are right the bond was posted so high that they could not get out. Not only that I believe that they will add more charges. The case was moved to a higher court, the judge is not buying all this bolonga he refused to listen to Randy’s whinning so maybe Dr. Phil will listen to him. I can see Dr. Phil saying to Randy, I can get the mental help you need, will you do this!. I am afraid that once this is aired on the Dr. Phil show a lot of people will not be convinced that Randy is a loving father in fact they will know that this man is a total jerk.

• Carry Grant
  Jan 27, 2007 at 8:31 pm

  Velmasdtr-You really are sick. You say that may be his parents were protecting him from the evils of this world and they were quilty of being over protective?? That sounds like you are saying that he is guilty of locking up his son for years. Yes, if you continue to use God, and say God will protect the innocent then then the child God will protect and will find Randy in prison for a long time and you my dear Nancy Piercy should be right along with him in jail, hand in hand. I know your family personally and you are all mental cases. I was just wondering if you are high at this moment, because you always were and everything was a joke to you. Well this is not a joke, and you cannot justify this one and leave God out of it you might get zapped by lightning.

• PiercyFamMember
  Jan 28, 2007 at 9:16 am

  “CarryGrant” If you know MY family so well, and you want to release names of the family, and speak so much of them, then identify yourself. Or are you to afraid to say who you are, but you want to come in here and talk crap about this family.

  Whatever Randy did is on Randy. MY family has nothing to do with it. So to call all of us names and wish ill will against us, is just downright IMMATURE.

  Not one single person reading this can say if this was there family, they would just simply turn around and look the other way and not be there for their family. And if you do, you are lying before God and you WILL go to hell.

  Now get YOUR head out of your ass and shut up. And grow some balls and indentify yourself. Because I honestly do NOT think you know this family. You are just another dumbass citizen who only reads the newspaper and thinks they know EVERYTHING.

• Carry Grant
  Jan 28, 2007 at 1:03 pm

  Whats a matter, are you so angry that I am taking up for this child and have the guts to do so!!!I know your family like the back of my hand and you are trash, trash because you don’t have the back bone nor guts to have any sympathy at all for this child. I read the police report, and have played an acitve role in the hearings at the court house. I sat there and shook my head. Your family has everything to do with it, you are out here running your mouth, so when you run your mouth family is involved. So I suggest that you get your head out of your ass and quit whinning about poor old Randy, and grow some balls and tell the truth for once in your life. You keep mentioning God in all of this and how he knows the truth, you are the one playing the role of God claiming Randy is innocent. There is no way that any grandmother would stand by and let their grandchild suffer. You would because you are sick and need help. I speak for that child and if you don’t like it you need to grow up, you are the immature one, but maybe you should keep up with the current events in this country (reading newspaper, news that sort of thing) because citizens don’t put up with ignorance. I know Nancy very well and how she gets paranoid when someone does not agree with everything she says. You would be surprised what I know and who I know. Identify yourself, thats right you can’t because you are afraid. If I was in your shoes I would be afraid also. I love the way you mention God and show a display of that kind of language. Look around lighting might strick you for using God in this.

• Carry Grant
  Jan 28, 2007 at 7:36 pm

  I don’t have to talk crap about your family, you talk enough crap to last a life time. The problem with you is the truth hurts and for once the Piercy’s are getting what they deserve. What Nancy has done to innocent people in the past has finally caught up with her. But this time she can’t hide, she can get high and laugh about it as a joke, but guess what it still slaps her in the face every morning when she is sober and has to look at herself in the mirror, knowing her grandson sat there in his underwear, pissing in a bottle, how degrading was that for this child. So she takes another puff because that way she can justify anything. But all she can think about is Randy who is locked up in jail, being monitored. I think they should make him piss in a two liter bottle, and make him sit there in his underwear, but I know he is getting better treatment than he gave his son. Whats really funny is everyone knows in the USA and other countries what a slime ball the Piercy family is.

• PiercyFamMember
  Jan 29, 2007 at 3:23 am

  See you can’t identify yourself either. Probably for the same reasons I won’t. You don’t want your name dragged through the mud due to lies and ignorance. Though I do have a feeling as to WHO you are. Actually I have about 3 options to choose from. If you were allowed into the courtroom like you SAID you were, you would have to be a member of the family or know someone who is. And I highly doubt, if you hate the Piercys that much, that you would be allowed into the courtroom, so you must be on speaking terms with at least one of them, or YOU USED TO BE ONE. You are either on Michelle’s side of the family, which would explain why you are so hostile towards the Piercys, or you are Randy’s ex-wife, Marsha.

• Carry Grant
  Jan 29, 2007 at 6:18 am

  I don’t hate the Piercy’s its your ignorance you are the ones that hate. I am taking up for the child can you? How can you sleep at night or look at yourself in the mirror. So you are saying that Michelles side of the family is taking up for the child and Randy’s ex wife Marsha? Good for them, you see Marsha’s son who is now 18 was done the same way. He was kept locked in his room for years and you are upset because they are standing up against this 300 pound bully???? I won’t let you know who I am because its none of your business. I don’t have to tell lies, and one thing for sure is I can sleep at night and knowing the right thing is being done. If there was nothing to this case the 750,000 bond would be dropped. Yes yall are the talk of the town, and all over the USA. So when you start running you mouth, which is filled with nothing but trash you ought not to tell people you are a Piercy Family Member because it means nothing. Michelle knew if she did not go along with this the Piercy family would hound her and make her life a living hell until she took up for Randy. She’s in jail right now knowing that she did wrong and should pay for it. Can Randy say the same? So because I voice my opinion you think you can control me, sorry. By the way, if you hate Michelle,s family (Randy’s wife) that much, the grandson, and Marsha I am suprised that they let you scum bags in the court room. One thing for sure is Randy will spend a lot of time behind bars. Just think about it, no judge is going to have mercy when Randy stands there and say “I did nothing wrong”. The facts are facts…. I know by going on the Dr. Phil show Randy thinks he will benefit from the proceeds of the show. Hoping that it will be enough for him to post bail and have our sympathy no way. If he was to post bail he would have to wear an ankle bracelet and be monitored at all times. If he gets any money out of this and by the way Dr. Phil does not contact people, The people contact him. The money should go to the child to take care of his needs. Why was this moved to a higher court???? There is a lot more going on besides the mental abuse of this child. By the way Randy should be a man and tell the judge he did wrong by locking up this child. Tell the truth insead of lieing, the judge hates liars. Randy has dug a hole so big, that it is enough for all of you to fall in it. You should be the mother, Nancy and tell Randy, Hey you did wrong, you don’t lock someone up for years especially a child. But instead you said go for it. Nancy claims she went to visit this child, while he sat in his underwear and ate pizza with him and watched some pirate movie. You can’t even tell what movie it was. No way would any of my family would do such a thing because they were nutured in a loving family and no way would I stand up for anyone who did this to a child. Get over yourself noone will have any pity, still can’t justify this one.

• WickedD-Pat123
  Jan 30, 2007 at 3:04 am

  Hi guys,

  as somebody who was once a member of a popular forum that Randall Piercy ran i felt that i ought to comment a little.

  On his forum (message board) this man was loved and admired by many (and hated by quite a few too) at one stage this forum was one of the fastest growing hardware forums on the internet.

  After Randalls demise a few things became known by the ex members of his webaite. Here are some of the details.

  1. Randall used to read private correspondence between members of his website. This was done by installing a hack into the forums software, this hack allowed so called “private messages” to be read by Randall and other admins. Randall would then use this information to ban members who linked to other related forums or admitted to running their own forums.

  2. Randall would ask members of his forums for money, certain members of his forum that admired/liked him would be approached to give him money in order for him to pay off his hosting/housing bill or just to get some free cash. He would threaten these people members to take down the forum if they did not send him the 100,200,300 or even 1000 dollar payments.

  3. randall would log all information being posted in the websites chatroom, these were available to be read by certain high level members and would be used to find members to suspend.

  The revelations of the aformentioned have turned the once loving community of Randalls friends and followers into a slightly angry and annoyed group of people that felt they have been ripped off and lied to. Many people have been suprised that the man was “supposedly” a child abuser.

  Although i have no idea what he was like at home, or even if these charges were true, i do know that what i have mentioned is true.

  None of us can REALLY know if he is guilty or not, but we can learn a little bit about the man behind the story.

  Regards,

  Patrick

• WickedD-Pat123
  Jan 30, 2007 at 3:12 am

  Correction,

  No chat room information was logged
  that was an error on my part. All other information above is correct though.

• Carry Grant
  Jan 30, 2007 at 6:30 am

  You are right, Randy and is family get angry when you talk against them. They go to the extremes and as of threats. They also like to find things out about other people and drag them in the mud just because they had a different opinion. I know that this is hard to swallow, but Randy, his mother probably was one of the board members, like everyone else to foot their bills. If he went out and got him a real job he would not be in jail, and would not have so much time to monitor his son. I know you don’t know if he is guilty or not. I do, I know the Randal’s family and I speak out for the boy. the police report states everything found. In his mind and his family’s mind they think he was protecting his son, which is by the way not true. The fact is the boy was found in that condition, he is a mental hospital because of it, They can sit there and say Randy did not lock him up. But the investigators (child porn investigators) found this. Now what part of this does the Piercy family not understand. Randy was caught red handed in a situation that he created himself. Why blame Michelle’s family (Randy’s wife) for turning their own daughter in, and Randy (scum bag)? They wanted to show their daughter that this was not right. This is not how she was raised. They wanted her to get the help she needed. Now to me, that takes guts, they are helping her deal with this, but still show the love and respect for their daughter by telling her when you do things, there are consequences. This was not a vendetta against the Piercy’s. They are saying this is not right. Now the Piercy family just say Hey, Randy did not do this, instead of leading him in the right direction, they claim to stand by him as not guilty. Figure that one.

• Carry Grant
  Jan 30, 2007 at 6:33 am

  by the way WickedDpat when they find out you said that they will start talking about you and you just have to ignore the Piercy family. Most of the time they are so stoned they don’t know the truth. They just want to control what you said. Remember, the freedom of speech. Say what you want you won’t be monitored by Randy any more.

• AnonymousReader
  Jan 30, 2007 at 11:30 am

  i don’t know where people get information from but last I heard (from all the local news stations and the local newspaper) the child was NOT put into a mental institution he is living with some family or a foster home something along those lines but he is not in a mental institution

  as for all the bickering people need to grow up and be adults and stop fighting a child is at stake here and life is to short for all of this immature name calling and bashing

  have a wonderful day everyone

• Carry Grant
  Jan 30, 2007 at 12:23 pm

  I know for a fact that there was not one word about where this child was placed in the media except Protected Custody. Well, I know, you don’t place a child that has no contact for years in with family or foster home. A child could not cope with that, right now nor would a child know how to act in another environment. Children display a lot of emotions by drawing or painting pictures. This child cannot even read. ON cases like these children are put in hospitals so they can learn how to cope with what they had to deal with and how to deal with their emotions. Sometimes they shut down and withdraw. A family member or foster parents would not know how to help this child professionally. I dont’t call this bickering, I call it telling the truth and if the truth hurts Oh well. You have to diplay that kind of language for the Piercy family because that is the only language they understand. Yes a child is at stake here and I will bicker, if you call it, Scream at the top of lungs and fight for this child. Life is too short and that has nothing to do with this immature name calling and bashing as you call it. In fact that would give you all the more right to let your voice be heard no matter how you display it and as adults we have that right.

• Carry Grant
  Jan 30, 2007 at 12:27 pm

  Nancy Piercy which is Randall’s Mother is trying to get custody of this child. I hope for that childs sake he is not placed with the Piercy’s when he is ready to be released from Protective Custody. Because he may as well go back to being imprisoned again. It would be a huge setback for him.

• johnwayne/life-long-family-friend
  Jan 30, 2007 at 1:37 pm

  hey carey what-ever, it should be sherlock holmes what an idiot, why should nancy or any piercy family member tell you anything, it’s pretty obvious your the type you can tell a mile away, but when your up close you can’t be told anything, okay fact, nancy was by child-care expert, she practically raised my four year old from birth and cared for my other two children while my husband and i struggled to make a living, most of the time at no charge…okay truth or dare, better do your homework, if you know nancy so well, what’s her doggies name she’s had for ten years?????? go now, make your phone calls…john wayne gonn kick your A—-

• Carry Grant
  Jan 30, 2007 at 8:21 pm

  Nancy Piercy or her so called family does not have to tell me anything. I know and she right now is scratching that head that is so empty she cannot figure out who is who. Nancy has never been a child care expert, she never raised your four year old from birth and cared for your other two children because she never was able to care for herself. Because of a back injury. Unless you want a drug addict to care for your children, and I think not. That is the truth about her smoking weed so I don’t have to name her dog to prove anything. Nancy does not do anything for anyone unless she benefits from it. John Wayne is an idiot and no matter what John Wayne says she cannot justify Nancy knowing about her grandson sitting in his underwear. Do you call that a child care expert? I know you are trying to take up for that piece of trash but sorry noone is buying. Yes, just like the Piercy’s always threatening to kick someone’s ass, having other people to do her dirty work. Everyone can see for themselves that Randy is sitting in jail right now because his mother Nancy did not do the right thing and lead Randy in the right direction by telling him it was wrong to let his child piss in a 2 liter bottle. Why you won’t let her take up for herself is beyond me, but I know she always had someone else to fight her battles. By the way her birthday is in December, she was born in 1947. If you think the court is going to buy that story of her being a child expert, the things she told the Jacksonville Times Union about her grandson and how she had no pity on him is sad. So when Nancy wants to get out here and defend Randy, I will be here to defend that innocent child. Go take a hike John Wayne your looking pretty stupid about now.

• Carry Grant
  Jan 30, 2007 at 8:51 pm

  John Wayne is trying to figure out who could possibly be talking about the Piercy family. Well guess what John Wayne, I could be anyone.

• johnwayne/life-long-family-friend
  Jan 30, 2007 at 9:43 pm

  right, now go scratchhey harey carey, sounds to me like you should smoke a little weed, no serioulsy if you knew nancy like i know nancy you would at least know the name of her dog…dumb-ass go find a life and get off the vengence team, you do know the grandfather that reported all this, excuse me i mean set this all up, molested his own son sean right!!!!! or maybe you need to do a little more research if your going to join the vendictive team, wouldn’t you say??????? not to mention he molested both of his stepdaughters, michelle being one of them…go crawl back in your hole, i know exactly who you are. technology is a wonderful thing, especially if you know the right people….now go scratch your empty head…

• Carry Grant
  Jan 31, 2007 at 6:12 am

  What’s a matter John Wayne- you are telling me that the grandfather set this all up. The parents of Michelle. Right, you are saying that he went over to Randy’s Piercy House and set up camera’s, had the boy piss in a 2 liter bottle, sit in his underwear, and also aim a camera at the toilet where the boy could be monitored. You are saying that all this the Grandfather set up. You are so sick and deraigned. The court sealed the molestation case because they claim an underage family member child molested Randys boy. Get this straight. Why was Randy’s other son, who is now 18 and can speak for himself was done the same way. Locked in his room. Oh I forgot, its the grandparents on Michelle’s side that set this up. You expect me to believe that this grandfather molested his own family get a life. You are just trying to justify Randy doing what he did. Who is to say that Randy, set the molestation between family members so he could video tape it and sell it on the web. Randy is the one that lied to his followers on Tazboard, hacking into the software so he could monitor what people were sayin and then kicking them out. He is the one that was collecting money to pay his bills. You can sit there and talk about Michelle’s stepdad all you want. Does not mean its true, you are saying he molested everybody and not put in jail. He was not put in jail because that was not true. the grandfather reported this because he was concerned for a little boy who had no voice. Someone had to. It sounds to me like you are very upset because Randy got caught and the Piercy family lies, and finally it is payback time. So keep running your mouth John Wayne you cannot justify any of this. I guess what you might can say is maybe Randy was molested too, locked in his room when he was a child. While Nancy watched. If you remember Randy’s father said Randy did nothing wrong, just being an overly conerned parent. Any body could say that but it does not mean its true. The problem is that none of the Piercy family cares about Randy’s son. All they care about is talking trash about Michelle’s family but it all boils down to one thing. Who is in jail, the investigators found evidence, so Randy is the guilty one. No one set Randy up, Randy did this because he wanted to make an extra buck to keep his house. Feed his 300 pound body, because he is the only one that benefited, fed his son oatmeal so Randy could eat a steak. I am not on any side, the facts are the facts, now go scratch your head, you can’t because there is nothing there.

• Carry Grant
  Jan 31, 2007 at 6:20 am

  One more thing, you say the media does not tell the truth and blows everything out of proportion. What about you John Wayne? Aren’t you blowing things out of proportion about the Michelle’s stepdad? Is this the only defense you can come up with? No facts to back you up. Who is on a vengence team, sounds to me like the Piercy family is because Randy is in jail.

• TheLoneRanger
  Jan 31, 2007 at 10:50 am

  Well now that all the celebrities have shown up. Yeeeeeeeehaw. Hiyoooo silver, awayyyyyyyyyyyyyyy!

  On another note. where’s Tonto?

• a member of randall's web site/and proud of it
  Jan 31, 2007 at 12:09 pm

  i’ve been taking notes for a couple of weeks now, i can’t believe some of this brow-beating garbage i’ve witnessed on this blog..randall’s true friends(such as myself) know what his site meant to so many people that he has helped, as far as the money thing, it was a neccasary evil, he did have a server to pay as well as other expenses, randall did moniter his site so he could keep porn and other garbage from filtering in, as all of you with a computer know this is at times an annoying problem. as for you carygrant or whatever your alter-ego is today, you and johnwayne need to put the boxing gloves on and duke this out, by the way cary your first name starts with an A. ooooooooops how did i know that.
  as for randall he’s a very stron person and he will get through this, also his true friends will be by his side…take care everyone and let this man have his day in court…a faithful friend of randall’s..

• Carry Grant
  Jan 31, 2007 at 12:18 pm

  Oh yea I hope his son is strong and has true friends to stand by him. Ooooooooooooooops, I forgot he had no friends. As for you a faithful friend of Randy’s I hope you can live with yourself. That what blogs are about. Randy lied to people on his site. If he could not afford to run it, or afford any of his expenses. Randy and Michelle both should took jobs and stop making everyone else foot his bills. The truth hurts.

• Carry Grant
  Jan 31, 2007 at 12:19 pm

  Randy was a bum.

• a member of randall's web site/and proud of it
  Jan 31, 2007 at 3:11 pm

  clearly your an idiot, it’s people like you that make legitimate web sites have to be monitored to filter out the idiots,(you) trouble makers(also you) and jealous gossipers,(definitely you) whats the matter A—E do you only dream about the love that randall and michelle have for each other, and always will regardless what you and dan boswell do or say to change that, clearly money is everything to you cause you sure don’t have any love for your husband, now do you????
  jealously is an ugly thing, and the more you people exhibit this the stronger randy and michelle grow….think about that you greedy—–
  again i value randall’s friendship and am willing tio go the extra mile for him, take that dumb a–

• Carry Grant
  Jan 31, 2007 at 6:01 pm

  You still don’t get it, the facts are facts, the child was not treated fairly think about that. Who cares what love Randy and Michelle have for each other. I don’t, what really matters is a child was abused, so that tells me how much love Randy and Michelle had for each other, because all they thought about was each other the hell with their son who sat there and paid a terrible price. Randy is nothing but a bum, always will be and nothing will change that. He was broke, because he refused to face reality that real people work for a living. So you can defend this 300 pound gorilla all you want. Its a free country, but the facts are facts. I can just see him looking at his computer and telling people please donate $100.00, 200.00. or he will shut down this site. Come on really, he played everyone for a fool, even you. Who cares about the Piercy family, they are all bums, what is sad about this is the child who sat there with tears in his eyes, crying for help and Randy sat there laughing.

• a member of randall's web site/and proud of it
  Jan 31, 2007 at 8:17 pm

  what matters is your still an idiot, when randall has his day in court you should be on your knees asking God to forgive you for pre-judging, but judgemental freaks like you think you are God, so never mind.

• missy
  Jan 31, 2007 at 8:49 pm

  I’m just browsing through, but the words of the Piercy supporters sound more like threats than genuine attempts to clarify the situation. If they have anything “real” to say about them or anyone else, it hasn’t been coming through too well. I’ve been trying to wrap my head around some mitigating circumstance that could make this into a good thing for the child and I’m not coming up with it. Tell me about the care that the child was getting or about what needs that had been identified that “required” such measures. I felt more empathy with the cagers in Ohio (was that the Gravelles — there are so many of these cases now –) The anger you spew on here alone makes me grateful that I don’t know any of you, let alone being entrusted to your care.

• The Zero Boss
  Jan 31, 2007 at 9:02 pm

  Missy speaks the truth. Stop with the stupidity, folks, or I’m shutting this thread down. You’re no longer contributing to any sort of conversation.

  if anyone has any facts to contribute in Piercy’s defense, please do so. I’ve seen no facts offered; just empty assertions that Piercy will be found not guilty, based on…well, nothing.

  Empty comments will henceforth be deleted with prejudice.

• Carry Grant
  Jan 31, 2007 at 10:19 pm

  Sorry if I got carried away with this nonsense, Zero Boss. Good-bye

• missy
  Jan 31, 2007 at 10:35 pm

  Shucks, I just wanted people to be a little less rabid — not go away. I searched the stuff about Dr. Phil and he did a jailhouse interview with RP on 1/8. There’s been nothing new reported since about that. Anyone got an air date? If there is one. Perhaps Dr. Phil checks these things out, but doesn’t always “bite.” Doesn’t seem quite right that RP would get financially compensated. — CarryG. I have seen your posts on this site and elsewhere — although a little “loud,” otherwise it seems like your heart is in the right place. — Zero Boss — thanks for being nice to the “newbie.”

• AnonymousReader
  Feb 1, 2007 at 1:25 am

  Randall Piercy is NOT getting compensated by the Dr.Phil show. I have not seen one single person that has ever claimed that. Dr.Phil came into Jacksonville to interview him for an upcoming show. Which SHOULD be on the air within a week or so I would guess, since they stated it would air within two weeks, and that was about a week ago.. I think he puts upcoming shows on his website but don’t quote me on that. Maybe it is there though. I have yet to check.

  On another note. I think Randall has a court date coming up soon. Anyone from the board planning on attending?

• Cary Grant
  Feb 1, 2007 at 5:32 am

  I think this should go on the Jerry Springer Show instead of Dr. Phil.

• Missy
  Feb 1, 2007 at 8:02 am

  I Saw the stuff about the jailhouse interview here:

  http://www.jacksonville.com/tu-online/stories/010607/met_7192273.shtml

  That’s what I was thinking exactly — Jerry Springer would be totally appropriate for these folks.

• Carry Grant
  Feb 1, 2007 at 12:36 pm

  Missy here is a site you can got to and view the police report. http://www.centralmediaserver.com/wtev/piercy_policereport.pdf

• missy
  Feb 1, 2007 at 3:53 pm

  Dear Anonymous, how can they be airing a show for which you say they did not come to interview him? (Duh!) And in the article (site at Comment 61), his defender (RP’s) is quoted as saying that he recommended that he not speak to Dr. Phil, but that he felt his client was desperate to raise the bail money. Which is why I inferred that RP was expecting something from it. You have yet to check much. I can’t speak for the veracity of the source, but at least I did check. Doesn’t sound like much of a show anyway — and at the end of the day, Dr. Phil is going to do what is good for Dr. Phil.

• a member of randall's web site/and proud of it
  Feb 1, 2007 at 6:19 pm

  you cannot attend court unless your a family member
  fyi

• Carry Grant
  Feb 1, 2007 at 6:35 pm

  http://www.jacksonville.com/tu-online/stories/101306/met_mother.shtml
  Read What the Piercy defense is all about.

• missy
  Feb 1, 2007 at 8:20 pm

  Maybe his “buds” could show up outside for moral support — which would be a total oxymoron in this case.
  Carry, I read the story, more of the same, huhn? Nancy must be a real trip. Seldom do so many of the people associated get so verbal. I guess now we see why.

• Chervern
  Feb 4, 2007 at 9:58 pm

  I too was a member of the Tazboard site and would like to make comment if I may. Even though one would like to keep an open mind on these things it becomes a little hard too after reading through all of this stuff (which I only found by accident after trying to find out where the Tazboard had gone to). I had only been a member of the BOARD for about a year and a half when it disappeared but I would like to make comment as regards some of the stuff which was mentioned about the running of the board. Yes I was asked (as was everybody that joined) to make a contribution/donation to the running costs of the board. My meagre donation was $5.00US (I am in Australia) and I was then afforded full rights of access to the board. I never ever noticed any hidden links or parts of the board that were off limits to me, and also I never ever noticed any porn of any type ever posted either in the forums or offered up for sharing and on several occasions I had noticed that some posts had been removed because of thier questionable content. So in that regard I would have to say that some of the stuff I have read here as regards the running of the board are grossly inflamed. However I too have since scoured the net for newspaper/police reports on this case and it saddens me to think that even some of this could be true. And in some way makes me feel a little ashamed that I had actually given this man some of my money. I have been trying to contact some of the other people on the site that I had had some contact with to see what thier viewpoints were but all FTP sites that was my only contact with them have seemingly disappeared, perhaps everyone from the board is just trying to distance themselves from the whole incident. In the end all I can say is that (and bear in mind it’s still gotta be proven to be true) if this had happened here in Australia, Mister Piercey would not have to worry about not being able to post his bail, he would gladly stay in jail, because his life would be in severe jeapordy if set free. Australians on a whole hate that sort of stuff. In anycase it will be interesting to wait and see the relevant outcomes.

• AnonymousReader
  Feb 5, 2007 at 10:35 am

  Missy, In reference to your reply to my post. I think you misread it. As your reply was:

  “Dear Anonymous, how can they be airing a show for which you say they did not come to interview him? (Duh!)”

  In my previous post I said:

  “Randall Piercy is NOT getting compensated by the Dr.Phil show. I have not seen one single person that has ever claimed that. *(end of sentence, notice the period, then I continue with)* Dr.Phil came into Jacksonville to interview him for an upcoming show.”

  I never said that Dr.Phil DIDN’T interview him. Maybe people should read more clearly before responding about something that was never said. I just wanted to clarify this because there was an obvious attempt to make my post look foolish with the “DUH” comment.

  CarryGrant, thank you for the link to the police report, it was an interesting read.

• missy
  Feb 5, 2007 at 6:22 pm

  Dear Anonymous Reader: Thank you for the lesson in reading comprehension. Perhaps you have noticed that there are quite a few misspellings and rampant misuse of punctuation in these posts. It was very easy to mis-read the placement of your period and I stand corrected. But the attorney quoted in the press release IMPLIED that the ONLY reason he (RP) was doing the interview was for FINANCIAL COMPENSATION. So the point was more about the FINANCIAL COMPENSATION THAN ABOUT WHEN OR IF DR. PHIL CAME. I sincerely apologize if you were offended by the “duh” comment. I’ll try to be more respectful in the future. And if you re-read, I believe you will find that the majority of these posts are somewhat foolish as they solve nothing and convince no one.

• Carry Grant
  Feb 6, 2007 at 7:24 pm

  I agree with you missy, I thought the same thing.

• missy
  Feb 9, 2007 at 1:03 am

  Thanks, CarryGrant! What an odd place to discover a kindred spirit! You inspire me to keep questioning and keep yelling about stuff I find reprehensible! I studied Dr. Phil’s web page and this story is not posted as being on his schedule. But the only listing I found was for coming week. They also have a list of upcoming topics and ask people to email them if the individual’s story meets any of the criteria of their upcoming shows. Several might fit this story. They apparently are soliciting for people who have resorted to various surveillance techniques to keep track of their kids. They don’t directly mention video though. They seem to be aiming more toward GPS tracking, etc. But any number of their story ideas might fit. I also read of a local couple who had been contacted by the Dr. Phil show to appear because of what show coordinators had been told by other family members who had contacted the show. But from the article I read, they taped their show about 3 months before it actually aired. So it may be awhile before we are treated to the RP Show, if ever.

• Carry Grant
  Feb 9, 2007 at 9:40 am

  I have also been looking for the show. But I am not sure if it will air at all because of the trial. Dr. Phil is a very smart man and he can read between the lines. Maybe he changed his mind. This show will a three ring circus for us all.

• Carry Grant
  Feb 9, 2007 at 9:41 am

  I meant this show will be a three ring circus.

• a member of randall's web site/and proud of it
  Feb 9, 2007 at 9:56 am

  of all the things in this world to be entertained by, i wonder why some people spend so much time on one blog, huuuuuuum….what about the police officer that tazed his 18 month old child, and oh what about the woman that microwaved her 4 month old baby, and the woman that hit and run a child, and then turned herself in a month later, she killed a child, and was out on a 5,000 dollar bond, look at this blog again, surley you can find a more interesting read then just the one concerning the piercy’s or the possibility of an upcoming dr. phil show. good grief, get a life…

• Missy
  Feb 9, 2007 at 1:52 pm

  Dear Member & Proud:
  I just keep coming back to see what obnoxious things you have said. Isn’t it ironic, you spend a lot of time here too! At least the victim of this incident is alive which makes it a little easier. Your “side” is the one that brought up the “importance” of Dr. Phil as a possible defender — we’re all just biding our time to see if that “pans” out. If our fixation offends you, the solution is obvious.

• a member of randall's web site/and proud of it
  Feb 9, 2007 at 2:05 pm

  funny how without mentioning any names you immediately get on the offensive, wow, go figure..all i said was aren’t there any other topics of conversation that may intrigue you, sorry to bust your bubble, i wasn’t attacking anyone, just making a valid point. go ahead have fun with your kangaroo court.

• missy
  Feb 9, 2007 at 3:41 pm

  Mem & Proud: I only used “I” because I can’t speak for anyone else. And there are plenty of topics that intrigue me but I didn’t think it would be appropriate to inventory them here. Perhaps, it was your earlier comments at #52 & #54 that led me to believe that possibly you meant to offend others. Wow, go figure! And here we are at #77 and I still haven’t read a thing from any of RP’s staunch supporters that explains anything. It’s almost as though they didn’t really know him at all or they are hiding a lot. It was RP’s supporters who first mentioned that Dr. Phil was interested, as though that was going to somehow vindicate him. Naturally, that piqued my curiosity. I for one, am anxious to hear of some mitigating circumstance that will make me believe he (RP) is not a monster. I would always prefer to believe the best about people. That is why I want to know what will be the basis of the Dr. Phil segment. I guess it would be better for your comfort level, if everyone looked the other way, but I think the cat is too far out of the bag on your friend.

• Carry Grant
  Feb 10, 2007 at 9:20 am

  Mem and Proud had no life because Mem and Proud spent their last $5.00 on Tazboard, so they can entertain themselves. Mem and Proud now is on this blog because Taxboard is shut down. Mem and Proud needs to remember you cannot control this blog, or what is said about Randy Piercy. So Mem and Proud needs to get a life.

• AnonymousReader
  Feb 11, 2007 at 12:36 pm

  I find it funny that #78 is full of grammatical errors yet they are trying to make others look stupid. CarryGrant must have been hitting the drugs a little to much before writing this entry. Say no to drugs kids. Mmmmm K, they are bad!

• Carry Grant
  Feb 11, 2007 at 1:17 pm

  It is so funny that is all you can come up with. We want to hear what defense you have for Randy Piercy. Anonymous Reader, in message #79 you forgot to put a space between the two words. I think you are stupid and kinda childish. I don’t have to explain myself about anything, you do. You are the one who claims that Randy Piercy did no wrong. If you knew anything about this trial, which you don’t, it is being held in JUV Court. I think what Missy said in #66 sums it all up. Anonymous Reader you are probably one of those morans who want to stand there for moral support, which there are no morals at all in your life. If there were you would not be defending the Piercy family at all. I suggest that you send Randy Piercy a violin to play. Maybe you should play one too. No one is listening to your garbage.

• a member of randall's web site/and proud of it
  Feb 11, 2007 at 9:45 pm

  obviously you are, or are you responding to casper…lol…lol

• missy
  Feb 11, 2007 at 9:46 pm

  Hey Carry Grant, Anonymous is so pitiful, I’m starting to feel sorry for them, like we’re being mean or something. When it gets that easy to get someone’s goat, it’s almost like taking an unfair advantage. I didn’t get to check up on this for a couple days and I laughed and laughed at what you said! I’m sorry, Mr. or Ms. Anonymous, you’re just too darn funny! If I’ve been disrespectful of anyone, I apologize in advance and for any misspelling or mispunctuations as well, because I know that is the most important part to some folks. And no matter what they say about the child in question now, it doesn’t explain the reports from the other son being given the same treatment until he “got away.” The people who support the Piercy point of view on this blog haven’t figured out that this would probably have dropped a long while back except they keep making comments! After all, I could not persist in answering myself indefinitely, could I? If this dies down before some late, breaking news revives it, or if I lose interest and go onto some other topic, it’s been very educational… Thanks, Carry! Thanks, ZeroBoss! You guys are the Greatest!

• a member of randall's web site/and proud of it
  Feb 11, 2007 at 9:46 pm

  just to add a little humor, but you probably won’t see it mr. or mrs c g your too busy poking and probing.

• Carry Grant
  Feb 12, 2007 at 5:14 am

  There is no humor at all in this, because a child was involved and suffered a loss. That is the point. Your sense of humor is way off, just like you saying that Randy did no wrong, what is the humor in that? I don’t have to poke and probe about something I already know about, and that is the Piercy family needs to get another life. I think all of you Piercy supporters jumped on the wrong band wagon and fell off. Which caused a lot of brain damage. We all know what Nancy Piercy’s problem in that area is and that is from smoking too much weed. If she fell off the band wagon she would never know it. You still have no defense.

• another anynomous reader
  Feb 12, 2007 at 5:59 pm

  i have one question, did nancy jilt you or something, you sure seem on her case several times about her aleged involvement with weed, what is your obsession, after reading previois blogs, you mentioned it on numerous occasions, but yet you don’t even know her doggies name, how well could you possibly know someone to make a call like that if you can’t even name her dog she’s had for 10 years, i think your an idiot, and your accusations are just as idiotic…and perhaps uninformed as well, can’t wait to hear a response that makes good sense.

• missy
  Feb 12, 2007 at 9:03 pm

  Dear another anonymous reader: Do you think the allegations and accusations of the state, which were made from the police reports, are also idiotic? If so, why? Please clarify your position as to the child’s neglect and abuse. I am specifically referring to the utter social deprivation, lack of medical and dental care and the prison-like regimen that is reported to have occurred. Other than the name of Nancy’s dog, do you have actual information? No one has alleged that the dog is not loved and well cared for. Thank you.

• johnwayne/life-long-family-friend
  Feb 12, 2007 at 9:15 pm

  i think anr is making reference to the fact if you can’t name her dog, which by the way i know then how can you make such an accusation as personal as she smokes weed, do you understand now??????

• missy
  Feb 12, 2007 at 9:23 pm

  I hope someone from the local drug unit is checking up on these blogs and decides to make it their business to find out if Nancy smokes weed. It would be sort of poetic justice if you good friends of the family ended up “ratting out” Nancy. Stranger things have happened. I for one don’t care how much she smokes or what, nor do I care who knows the dog’s name. JWLLFF, I’ll ask you the same thing: do you know of any circumstances that would require such treatment of a child? You don’t even have to refer to this child, just in general, what would require that? Did you go to public school, bathroom when you felt the need and have social activities outside your home? Have you no empathy for the child whatsover and no understanding of the questions that other people are raising here?

• Voice Of Reason
  Feb 13, 2007 at 3:52 am

  You all keep making reference to RP’s other son who was SUPPOSEDLY treated the same way.

  If this was true, then why does RP’s OLDEST son, said son’s BROTHER, who ALSO lived in the home, say this is all false and that his brother is only making all of this up about their dad just to get on tv??? Hmmmmm.

  And furthermore, if RP’s middle son, who claims this supposedly happened to him, is telling the truth, then how come there are no police reports about it, then nor now? He is of age, he could and could have filed a police report, but hasn’t and didn’t. Hmmmmm.

  Next….

• Carry Grant
  Feb 13, 2007 at 6:33 am

  Read #62 which is the police report and what they
  found. Why would this middle son, lie just to get on TV, which is so far fetched, when the police report backs up his statement. Maybe that older son was also abused mentally and thinks that it is okay to be treated that way. The middle son didn’t report it because he figured no one would believe him and that he is not a vendictive person
  like you. He was afraid of what Randy might do to him if he reported it so when Randy got caught with the youngest stepbrother, he felt safe with Randy in jail to tell the truth. I believe the middle son’s story because of what the detectives found at the home. As far the older son goes, he will probably be another Randy Piercy.

• missy
  Feb 13, 2007 at 8:06 am

  Well, it seems like no matter what he (the son who made public comments) had to say, whether it was “for” RP or “against” RP, he could have had his say on TV. Everyone wants to know, so what reason would he have had to lie? I think he could have gotten media interviews either way. If he were well treated, what possible reason would he have had to lie? And the other children have not made public comments about good treatment. No one has made public comments about good or normal treatment. Their silence speaks volumes. In fact, other than the child watching a pirate movie with his grandma, no one has professed to knowing anything good. That includes all the staunch supporters. None of you have said anything about frequenting the home and observing the child apparently having a normal existence. None of you have professed to any knowledge that refutes the police and media reports. And watching a movie in one’s underwear in a bedroom for a little visit doesn’t exactly sound like a “good time” to me. Especially for a nine year old. Denying privacy to a child is abuse. Did you know that? Videotaping their lack of privacy could be construed as child porn, did you know that? And by the way, Dr. Phil does not have anything on his schedule again this week relating to the case. I also scoured the message boards at Dr. Phil.com and there is nothing about Randall Piercy. What I can’t figure out is why some people are so staunchly supporting him if they don’t know anything about the child’s actual day to day life. As usual, please excuse any grammatical or spelling errors. Please note that no disrespect is intended toward anyone. Thank you.

• Carry Grant
  Feb 13, 2007 at 9:10 am

  Very well said, Missy. You are absolutely right. Facts are facts.

• johnwayne/life-long-family-friend
  Feb 13, 2007 at 12:27 pm

  you know what, i am a friend of the piercy’s and damn proud to say so, the piercy’s signed a contract with dr. phil, which means they are not allowed to speak about this until the show airs, but i signed no such contract. i’ve read some of your comments and felt compelled to respond, which i know is exactly what you want, especially cg. cg you are seriously misinformed, first of all the middle son molested this child(randall’s and michelle’s,the child in question) as a result dcf only allowed the child to return home if randall could prove he was under 24hour surveliance which is why the camera’s were installed…he was also under house arrest, and had to report to dcf every two hours which had to be done from the house phone may i add he also had to wear an ankle bracelet, this was a little more then he could handle and don’t forget he was randall’s pride and joy and he felt betrayed by his father, he thought it was okay what he did and his father turned against him, he then ran away while he was under house arrest and ended up in a group home with 2yrs. probation and serious counseling. he aquired a hate for his father because he was the favorite of randall’s and couldn’t handle the pressure, randall spent several hundred dollars on surveliance equipment so the boy could return home, this was ordered by dcf. he gets on camera and says he was under constant surveliance, but neglected to say why, he’s 18 now and he knows this will all come out in the up-coming trial so now he’s a little concerneed with what his friends will think when they learn what he did to his little brother, then gets on camera and pretends to be so abused, most likely to redeem himself with what he is certain will be an important issue. okay, draw your own conclusions, as i’m sure you will, now i’m wondering if cg just might be the middle son. guess we will know soon enough. i hope i’ve enlightened some of your frustations, if not oh well, this is all i have to say on the matter. hey middle son aren’t you a little ashamed to get on camera and pretend to want to protect m when your the one he needed protection from. i don’t expect a response.

• johnwayne/life-long-family-friend
  Feb 13, 2007 at 3:15 pm

  one other thing cg, randall’s oldest son is a lot like his father, that’s why he has two jobs and goes to school as well, so needless to say he’s a very responsible adult, every family has a bad seed.

• amylulu
  Feb 13, 2007 at 4:07 pm

  I just want to know one thing…if that is the case, then why is the victim the one punished? Video surveillance is one thing, but only being allowed out of the room specific times a day, not being granted the benefits of education, no medical care, being deprived of family interaction…why? Why is this okay? If you were raped, do you think that you should be “protected” in a prison-like environment with no social or educational or medical interaction? Please answer that for me. I am not judging, I just want those questions answered.

• johnwayne/life-long-family-friend
  Feb 13, 2007 at 5:25 pm

  thank you for not judging, and because you didn’t, i can only say please don’t believe everything you read okay, when the time comes, you will know the truth, several people on this blog have made a futile attempt to enlighten, it only led to more inquisitions and accusations, so who do i think i am to explain it all away, i’m sure to raise more questions, so if you can be patient and wait, it will all be revealed. thank you for understanding any more explanantions will just lead to more questions.

• Carry Grant
  Feb 13, 2007 at 5:36 pm

  John Wayne you keep saying that you are a friend of the Piercy family and proud of it when there is nothing to be proud of. The whole Piercy family are sick people and have no morals, no respect for anyone. Not even their own family members. The whole family is based on nothing but lies, and garbage. There is no contract with Dr. Phil because they talked to Randy alone, and the Piercy family was not there. So they do not know what was said so that is why they won’t say anything they don’t know. I wish Dr. Phil could read the garbage you put out. He would not even lower himself to put this on his show. Jerry Springer would be great for the Piercy family because that shows the lower class of trash. What you are saying is not true because you want to make the middle son afraid to testify which he will. What you say about DCF and what they told Randy to do is so far fetched that you really believe your or the Piercy family’s lies. Sorry John Wayne I am not stupid, and you cannot still convince me that all this happened. No one in their right mind would even attempt to defend this. I think it is so funny that you do not know who I am, but you are willing to put out all kinds of garbage and by doing so you just put the Piercy familys business out. None of it is good, but it seems to get worse. You still cannot justify what Randy did. I don’t think the middle son would be worried about his friends knowing anything when this is going to trial because it is hear say, and the main reason you seem to forget is the children were in Randy’s care. Why was the youngest son locked up, before and after the other children left. Remember he was locked up in a smaller room than the one he was in before the other children left.After the other children left he was put in a not much larger room. You and everyone that knows Randy knows he did not work, he was a bum. He had an internet business which he sold T shirts and had his tazboard. He had no time to work he was too busy as you say monitoring his son on video. So all I can say is now the whole world knows what the Piercy family is all about and the sick reasoning why they claim is behind Randy’s abuse of his child. Sorry John Wayne none of us are buying what you are selling and that is nothing. I think you can come up with better lies than the one you just told. Whats funny is what you are saying is that all of this does add up to child porn right? Go ahead tell more lies, you are just making things look worse for the Piercy family. I am laughing at you, because you still can’t figure out who I am.

• Carry Grant
  Feb 13, 2007 at 5:52 pm

  Amylulu- What John Wayne just said about the middle son is not true. DCF does not do what John Wayne said about the 24 hour monitoring of his middle son. Nor do they place the abuser back into the home. John Wayne is trying to defend what Randy Piercy did to his son as okay, the son was placed in his room not because of the molestation but because Randy is sick and needs mental help. John Wayne cannot defend this at all. John Wayne is right don’t believe anything that was said in #93. It is a joke. You probably won’t get a straight answer from John Wayne.

• Carry Grant
  Feb 13, 2007 at 6:01 pm

  Read #62 Amylulu, that is the police report than you can decide for yourself. John Wayne is so worried about Randy Piercy being judged, not realizing that John Wayne is judging the child that was locked up.

• johnwayne/life-long-family-friend
  Feb 13, 2007 at 8:34 pm

  oh my gosh what vengeance your displaying, even a little anger, i don’t care who you are your a liar cary grant, and soon everyone will know that, then if you plan on revealing yourself, you might want to find a rock to crawl under…mmmmmkkkkk til then go ahead with your stupid misinformed bs ignorance build a bridge and get over yourself…i’m done with your ignorance, this will be my last entry.

• johnwayne/life-long-family-friend
  Feb 13, 2007 at 8:38 pm

  one last thought however, did you notice as soon as someone else posts a comment cary grant quickly tries to make them see only the bad, mostly comments he has made, sounds a bit personal don’t ya think???? see ya, won’t be back, you can try all the tricks you know cg, won’t work, maybe a full fledged apology after all is said and done would be nice though, i know randall would forgive you

• missy
  Feb 13, 2007 at 9:35 pm

  Supplying someone with a police report is not vengence.
  http://www.news4jax.com/news/10068433/detail.html is the site where I read about the interview with Jacob. It was not very detailed, though and there has been no follow up. So it’s a “for what it’s worth” kind of thing. But no other family members have reported anything to the press or come out and refuted it so far that I have read.

• Voice Of Reason
  Feb 14, 2007 at 1:45 am

  Carry Grant, you know NOTHING, yet you claim to know EVERYTHING. Dr.Phil DID talk to RP in Private, that fact is true. BUT..and this is the key, his staff talked to the family. And they DID sign contracts. I know this for a fact. Everyone who was interviewed by Dr.Phil’s staff, signed contracts.

  Carry Grant…insert foot into mouth here~~>

• Voice Of Reason
  Feb 14, 2007 at 1:48 am

  P.S

  Carry Grant. If DCF didn’t order RP to put those cameras in his house, then why does he have paperwork proving it??? Those forms are not fabricated, so they must have come from somewhere.

  Whoooooops, next!

• Peggy
  Feb 14, 2007 at 1:56 am

  Exactly Missy. Re #102. There has been no follow-up. Because there is nothing to follow-up. From what I heard, his whole reason for doing that interview, was simply to get on TV. And since the news didn’t do a follow-up, I would assume they didn’t see it as much of a reputable story. They don’t like to waste their time on garbage. As for the other family, with all of the hatred that is being said about them, why would they talk? They are being judged and judged by people who do not know them period. Being called trash, garbage, low lives? And by people who don’t even know a thing about them. How would you feel if such was being said about you and your family, would you run out to do a public interview and subject yourself to further ridicule? I think not. Which is probably why they haven’t.

• Carry Grant
  Feb 14, 2007 at 5:31 am

  Peggy, I know the Piercy’s like the back of my hand and nothing good has ever come from that family. Whats sad is they really believe their own lies, and as far as the garbage part, and low lives. I am sorry but that is the way I feel because I have dealt with them personally. I don’t hate them, I hate what they have done to others. The reason they won’t come out for a public interview is that it would make them look even worse. You are taken my comments and turning
  them around so that they can feel sorry for themselves Look at the hatred they displayed for the middle son and all of Michelle’s, (Randy’s wife,) family. They are judging the middle son, they are judging Michelle’s family, so someone needs to remind them what goes around does eventually make its way back. Michelle’s family are good decent people who want what is best for their daughter and grandson. The middle son said what he had to say, and he gets judged for it. Please stop this pity party for the Piercys. They made their bed now let them lye in it. Lets not forget what the real reason is behind this, a child was abused. If you keep that in mind, then you can focus on the real facts and forget about the Piercy family getting their feelings hurt, it was bound to happen.

• CarryGrant_family
  Feb 14, 2007 at 7:24 am

  I know the Grant’s like the back of my hand and nothing good has ever come from that family. What’s sad is they really believe their own lies, and as far as the garbage part, and low lives. I am sorry but that is the way I feel because I have dealt with them personally. I don’t hate them, I hate what they have done to others.

  huh, look at that, it really is that easy to be an expert in here.

• Carry Grant
  Feb 14, 2007 at 8:46 am

  I am laughing so hard, at what you saying you are Carry Grant family member, you are just repeating what I say. Why because you cannot figure out who I am and cannot come up with anything on you own because you don’t know. You think I am the middle son, you thou